The Case of Nonprofits – Developing Early Achievers, a Joint Effort
Developing Early Achievers, a Joint Effort
Timeline of Events
Early Achievers Timeline
Key events that led to the development and state-wide implemenatation of WA's QRIS
-
Nov 18, 2024
2006
- The Department of Early Learning (DEL) founded as a cabinet-level state agency.
- Thrive by Five Washington launched as a public-private partnership to coordinate early learning investments.
- DEL created through HB 2964 which also instructs the DEL director to “actively participate in a non-governmental public-private partnership focused on supporting government's investments in early learning and promoting school readiness and success” (2SHB 2964 Report, 2006).
-
Nov 18, 2024
2007
- Public funds are allocated to pilot a voluntary Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) and to develop a state Early Learning Plan.
- The responsibilities of the DEL-Thrive by Five private-public partnership are outlined.
- HB Report E2SSB 5828 tasks DEL to develop the QRIS.
-
Nov 18, 2024
2008
- The economic recession led to public funding for the QRIS pilot being cut.
- The Gates Foundation steps in to fund a modified QRIS pilot (now called Seeds to Success) and to continue the development of the state Early Learning Plan.
-
Nov 18, 2024
2010
- The state adopts 10-year Early Learning Plan. Along with Seeds to Success, these became the building blocks for the state’s application to the Race to the Top Early Learning Grant.
- 10 Year Learning Plan "The two key building blocks—an evidence-based QRIS and a long-term blueprint for moving forward—would become the basis for the state’s Race to the Top-Early Learning Grant.” (Olson, 2019, p. 9).
-
Nov 18, 2024
2011
- The state wins $60 million from the federal Race to the Top Early Learning grant.
- 71% of the money ($42.6 million) was allocated to support the development of the QRIS over the next 4 years.
-
Nov 18, 2024
2012
- The state transitions to Early Achievers, an improved QRIS.
- DEL contracts with Cultivate Learning from the University of Washington and with Child Care Aware, a Tacoma-based NPO, to help develop Early Achievers based on lessons from Seeds to Success and other national models.
-
Nov 18, 2024
2015
- The Early Start Act is signed, increasing the DEL budget by 25%. The bulk of the money was to strengthen Early Achievers.
- The new law also required all licensed or certified childcare providers who receive state funding to participate in Early Achievers beginning in August 2017, and to meet quality standards by January 2020 to continue receiving funds.
- Early Start Act “added $158 million to DEL’s operating budget—a 25% increase. While about $41 million was to maintain and expand access to early education for children, the bulk of the money—$98.5 million— was to strengthen the Early Achievers quality improvement system. The new law required that all licensed or certified childcare providers who receive state funding for children birth to age five participate in Early Achievers, beginning in August 2017” (Olson, 2019, p. 13).
For Washington State, developing a Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) was a long process. It started with the creation of a new agency, the Department of Early Learning (DEL), and a government-nonprofit partnership with a newly created organization, Thrive by Five Washington. Early Achievers received consistent legislative support throughout its creation. Its development was characterized by the notion that creating a more cohesive and integrated, high-quality early learning system required a collaborative effort.
However, the partnership met challenges and setbacks. One challenge that it faced was the development of strong and strategic partnerships. As a new organization, Thrive by Five seemed to have a very ambitious mandate: align and coordinate public and private investments, manage and oversee demonstration communities, pilot test evidence-based programs (e.g., home visiting), and advance early learning statewide. Additionally, it had a board that, albeit influential, knew little about early learning. Also, its executive director’s leadership style clashed with that of the DEL’s director at the time12Olson, L. (2019). In pursuit of quality: A case study of Early Learning in Washington State. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://local.gatesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/In-Pursuit-of-Quality.pdf . Although these leadership positions eventually changed, and greater collaboration was accomplished, the initial hopes for this partnership weren’t realized in practice.
According to Juliet Taylor, at the time the director at DEL, a pilot program was started in 2007 that felt chaotic and lacked consistency. A reason for this? Multiple agencies were implementing the pilot program at the community level, depending on geographic location. The state determined they needed a more consistent system approach in every region of the state. A major setback was the funding cuts resulting from the economic recession. At this point, teams had been hired and trained but now, even with the Thrive by Five funding, DEL had to scramble to keep this program afloat. The 2008 funding cuts brought a slowdown, and it became a time of learning and determination. During this period DEL and Thrive by Five needed to figure out what they would want for the next run of the QRIS based on what they learned from the execution of the pilot. During this time, Thrive by Five took on a more passive role, and after RttT, changed its focus to other issues.
Taking Early Achievers to the next level
Once the state earned the Race to the Top grant in December 2011, work around the QRIS was reactivated with $42.6 million allocated to its development over the next four years. The idea that the DEL had been working on for the past couple of years, now had the funding to become a reality, but again, it couldn’t be accomplished in isolation. The DEL contracted with Child Care Aware (CCA), a Tacoma-based nonprofit organization, and Cultivate Learning, from the University of Washington. Child Care Aware had a direct programmatic role, of technical assistance, and Cultivate Learning was hired to support coach training and to collect and evaluate data. That helped include evidence-based indicators and practices into the QRIS.
Rose said there was an apparent dichotomy between focusing on what was most important for providers and achieving positive child outcomes. According to Deeann Puffert, of Child Care Aware, it was also about the ideal notions of what was expected for Early Achievers and all the challenges it had in practice; it required broad cultural shifts and many concessions from the government towards providers. Puffert recalls that getting to “winning spots” required them to work hard together, making her feel that, in time, it became a more established, hard-won partnership than what they started with. This apparent differentiated focus led to certain tensions that in the end proved to be necessary. Rose also concludes, you can’t have positive child outcomes without establishing support for providers.
“I feel like we ended up in a winning spot because we both played our role with respect for one another and what each of us brought to the table resulted in good wins for the children of Washington State” – Deeann Puffert
Getting providers on board
At the same time as these decisions were being discussed, there was the matter of achieving high levels of participation from providers, considering the QRIS started as a completely voluntary system. Child Care Aware, along with other regional community-based nonprofit organizations, mediated the relationship between childcare providers and workers, who were at some points opposing the development of a QRIS, and the government. While some community organizations cast doubt, they widely accepted the intent of the “improvement” (I) of QRIS and the supports to help programs and educators do great work with children and families. During the first years, the work was heavily focused on getting providers to volunteer and wanting to be a part of it. Thanks to these advocacy efforts, enough consensus was able to be built around all the benefits the QRIS would provide.
Nicole Rose also recognizes the partners' role in shaping the pathways for providers to participate, especially Head Start and ECEAP, who already had quality standards. These issues shifted after the passing of the Early Start Act in 2015, which mandated participation in the QRIS for any provider that was receiving state funding. Rose highlights how these community partners and what she called “trusted messengers” became even more important supports then, mediating between what the state established should happen and what was actually going on in these educational communities. Other partners included Voices of Tomorrow, Washington Communities for Children Coalitions, and the Washington State Association for Head Start and ECEAP.
Advocating in a way government can’t
While having nonprofit organizations as partners can help in thinking about design pathways, it’s necessary to recognize the role of “trusted messengers,” not only from the government to the providers but also the other way around. Because the state can’t advocate, NPOs played an important advocacy role throughout the development of Early Achievers. Nicole Rose mentioned a strategic decision to establish relationships with groups that can advocate, to make the space for those conversations that will help “push the envelope.”
Puffert and Rose agree on how interorganizational collaborative efforts require the capacity to understand and reflect on the other side’s perspective and needs. Both government and nonprofit partners must recognize the value the other is bringing to the work, define what is negotiable, and accept that you’ll disagree on some issues.
Citations
- 19. Olson, L. (2019). In pursuit of quality: A case study of Early Learning in Washington State. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/documents/in-pursuit-of-quality.pdf